Archive for June, 2003

The Importance of MPs

June 10th, 2003

This essay was written for Political Science 260B in Spring 2003.

Pierre Elliot Trudeau is Canada's most famous politician. Canadians interested in politics are not indifferent to Trudeau: he incited extreme feelings in both friends and foes. Compared to most Members of Parliament, Trudeau was, to say the least, unusual. His experience of Parliament Hill was also unusual. It is not surprising, then, that Trudeau's opinion on the relative importance of MPs -- that they are nobodies 15 minutes away from Parliament Hill -- is incorrect. This paper divides MPs into three groups: those in government, those in opposition, and those independent of parties. Government MPs are subdivided into five subgroups: Cabinet ministers, caucus officers, backbenchers, committee chairs, and parliamentary secretaries. Opposition MPs are subdivided into three subgroups: caucus officers, critics, and backbenchers. Independent MPs are not subdivided. Drawing heavily on David Docherty's Mr. Smith Goes To Ottawa: Life In The House Of Commons, this paper outlines the various parliamentary responsibilities of each of these groups, describes the role of an MP in his or her constituency, and argues that the concentration of power in the Prime Minister's Office from Trudeau to Chrétien and the political realities of the party system in Canada mean that most MPs are -- and will remain for the foreseeable future -- much more important in their constituencies than they are on Parliament Hill.

» Read more: The Importance of MPs

Transtextuality

June 10th, 2003

I had my third thesis meeting this morning. I wasn’t very productive in the past two weeks, partly because I had two papers – one on the importance of MPs on Parliament Hill and one on how technology can be used to lessen the social isolation of recent immigrants to Toronto – due today.

I’ve made a list of 177 different examples of transtextuality in Beatrice Chancy. These examples were organized into four categories: intertextual, paratextual, architextual, and hypotextual. These categories, developed by Gérard Genette, are outlined in an introductory essay on semiotics. Intertextual includes allusion, quotation, and plaigarism; paratextual includes prefaces, photographs, and dedications; architextual includes generic conventions, such as the division of a play into acts and scenes; and hypotextual includes genre innovation, parody, and satire.

Now that I am reasonably familiar with the primary texts, the focus for the next week will be on articulating a theory of transtextuality. This theory does not have to be original – it needs to be good. I will submit a 250 word theory of transtextuality next week.

Also, I will make a list of genres employed in the primary texts and research the conventions of those genres. Genre plays an important role in transtextuality because it connects a text to many other texts and the historical situation of those texts. In my discussion today with Dr. Warley, I discovered that my understanding of genre is fairly poor. While I have a good unconscious understanding of various genres, my conscious knowledge of the conventions of various genres – epic and lyric poetry, verse tragedy, drama, the novel, the short story, etc – is weak.

I am very enthusiastic about my thesis. In the next seven days, I will be working on the analytical framework for my thesis, rather than the specific instances of transtextuality in the primary texts. I may also do some research on the history of Blacks in Canada.